Taken from the roll call in the town’s own minutes. The minutes record who was not there and almost never why.
What was decided (9 motions)
9 carried, 0 recorded otherwise. Every motion below is printed as the minutes print it.
That the Committee of Adjustment adopt the Agenda as submitted.
Moved by Sue Dunfield, seconded by Ron Pollard
Carried
That the Planning Advisory Committee adopt the Agenda as submitted.
Moved by Jeff Banks, seconded by Sue Dunfield
Carried
That this Committee approve the Committee of Adjustment Minutes of Wednesday, October 26, 2022 and Wednesday, December 14, 2022 as submitted.
Moved by Jeff Banks, seconded by Ron Pollard
Carried
That this Committee approve the Planning Advisory Committee Minutes of Wednesday, October 26, 2022 and Wednesday, December 14, 2022 as submitted.
Moved by Ron Pollard, seconded by Jeff Banks
Carried
That the Planning Advisory Committee recommends to Council that Jeffery Whitney’s request for a refund of a road encroachment application fee be granted to allow for a full refund of the $734.00 application fee.
Moved by Jeff Banks, seconded by Sue Dunfield
Carried
That the Section 45 Application A-32-2022 by Michelle Sutherland & Milan Skubnik of the Ward of North Crosby-Newboro, is approved as submitted for the following reasons provided the attached conditions are complied with. REASONS: 1. There are no anticipated negative impacts to Cultural Heritage Landscapes considering the Shoreline Buffer Planting Plan; 2. There are no anticipated land use compatibility issues, and; 3. There are no anticipated impacts to the surrounding properties and neighbourhood. CONDITIONS: 1. That this approval is based on the following specifications and that any deviation from these specifications will require subsequent review and approval by the Township: a. The dimensions and location of the proposed structure(s) shall be consistent with the approval; b. All setbacks and development parameters shall be consistent with the details noted in the revised site plan and compliant with Zoning By-law 2005-6 where no approval has been granted; 2. That the owners adhere to the submitted Shoreline Buffer Planting Plan. The owners shall encourage the development of a shoreline naturalization buffer (no disturbance area) extending 15m back from the high water mark. The shoreline access path through this area is permitted; 3. That any accessory structure on the property shall be restricted to a size smaller than the proposed dwelling in order to ensure that the primary building on the property is the dwelling; 4. That the existing 252sqft of unattached waterfront
Moved by Sue Dunfield, seconded by Mayor Hoogenboom
Carried
That the Planning Advisory Committee acknowledges the written report by Kayla Porter, Development Services Analyst, and verbal overview by Brittany Mulhern, Manager of Development Services regarding the Draft Villages Community Improvement Plan (CIP) and further recommends to the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Rideau Lakes that the Draft Villages Community Improvement Plan be formally released to the public to gain feedback on the draft document.
Moved by Sue Dunfield, seconded by Mayor Hoogenboom
Carried
That the Planning Advisory Committee acknowledges the written and verbal report by Foster Elliott, Development Assistant, & Brittany Mulhern, Manager of Development Services, regarding Bill 23, Options for similar achievement of Site Plan Control, and further recommends to Council that staff are directed to conduct further research on a potential Shoreline Protection/Preservation By-Law. Further, that staff are to include consideration of proposed amendments specific to shoreline protection through the Comprehensive Zoning By-Law Update.
Moved by Mayor Hoogenboom, seconded by Ron Pollard
Carried
That the Planning Advisory Committee acknowledges the written and verbal report of Brittany Mulhern, Manager of Development Services, regarding matters provided for information purposes. Further that applicants of SP-45-2022 & SP-61-2022 be refunded $299, that the applicants of SP-49-2022 & SP-63-2022 be refunded $434, and that the applicant of SP-62-2022 be refunded $651 as a result of Bill 23 and the requirement to cancel the noted applications.